[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4423d670901120240m6ee29951ucc1c0f16c27d398c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:40:15 +0300
From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@...il.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@...e.cz>,
"Kernel Testers List" <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated
2008/12/4 Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>:
> On Mon 2008-11-24 19:17:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>>
>> > 2008/11/24 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>:
>> > > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0
>> > > hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
>> > > ODEBUG: object is on stack, but not annotated
>> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> > > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:251 __debug_object_init+0x2a4/0x352()
>> >
>> > Bisected down to 26afe5f2fbf06ea0765aaa316640c4dd472310c0
>> > (x86: HPET_MSI Initialise per-cpu HPET timers)
>> >
>> > Revert helps
>>
>> That's just a warning about a missing annotation. The commit is fine.
>
> You must be using very different metric of what "fine" means than rest
> of the world.
>
> (No, introducing WARN_ON()s is not fine; it spams kerneloops.org at least...)
The warning is still here on 2.6.29-rc1.
It taints the kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists