[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901122138.49092.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:38:48 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] remove (more or less) unnecessary cacheline_aligned from module_ref
On Monday 12 January 2009 13:48:41 Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On x86_64 systems with CONFIG_MAXSMP set, NR_CPUS is exploded to 4096
> cpus. This cacheline_aligned attribute on the local_t in module_ref
> results in struct module bloating to over 512KB in size on x86_64, which
> tends to, er, add up. This results in insane disk usage on distro
> kernel configs (1GB+ on Fedora.)
>
> Killing cacheline_aligned reduces the size of struct module to somewhat
> more sane levels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
Yep, I've applied this.
> I'll followup with a patch to make mod->ref dynamically allocated, but
> that needs a bit more thinking because module_unload_init currently
> doesn't have a failure path.
Thanks, that'd be good. And it'll be even nicer when the new per-cpu
allocator goes in.
Thanks,
Rusty.
It really needs the per-cpu alloc patches which are pending to make it
>
> Of course, reducing NR_CPUS to something sane was an easy way to patch
> over the problem.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 4f7ea12..32b0bda 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ void *__symbol_get_gpl(const char *symbol);
> struct module_ref
> {
> local_t count;
> -} ____cacheline_aligned;
> +};
>
> enum module_state
> {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists