[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496B2A02.6030009@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:31:14 +0100
From: Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@...osome.natur.cuni.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12410] resource map sanity check conflict: 0x7fffff00 0x800000ff
0x7ffff000 0x7fffffff ACPI Non-volatile Storage
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12410
> Subject : resource map sanity check conflict: 0x7fffff00 0x800000ff 0x7ffff000 0x7fffffff ACPI Non-volatile Storage
> Submitter : Martin MOKREJŠ <mmokrejs@...osome.natur.cuni.cz>
> Date : 2008-12-30 14:56 (13 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123064945018849&w=4
The above bug is gone from 2.6.29-rc1.
I see the
WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1017 ata_sff_hsm_move+0x467/0x69a()
line but know patch already went through this list.
For the
spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7.
message I will start another thread if I won't find it in kernel archives/
mail yet unread email.
Martin
View attachment "dmesg-2.6.29-rc1" of type "text/plain" (25969 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists