linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090112123349.GD29628@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:33:49 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated


* Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com> wrote:

> 2009/1/12 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > > (No, introducing WARN_ON()s is not fine; it spams kerneloops.org at
> >> > > least...)
> >> >
> >> > The warning is still here on 2.6.29-rc1. It taints the kernel.
> >>
> >> Does this fix it?
> Yes, it does. Thanks Peter.

thanks - added your Tested-by tag to the commit too.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/