[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090112144653.GB14016@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:46:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: xen: fix too early kmalloc call
* Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:53:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: xen: fix too early kmalloc call
> > >
> > > From: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
> > >
> > > Impact: fixes bootup of xen.
> > >
> > > Christophe reported the following problem:
> > >
> > > > (basically it seems that SLAB is not yet up, with earlyprintk it is
> > > > giving me an Oops in __kmalloc before)
> > >
> > > Replace call to kmalloc with alloc_bootmem.
> > >
> > > Also from Christophe:
> > > > (me)
> > > > > Or I could copy the text and submit it as a new patch?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I would prefer that. Also, my commit message was not really
> > > > following Kernel standards and it's only a very simple change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> >
> > i've applied the fix to tip/cpus4096, in the form below.
> >
> > Please submit clean log messages. Your commit description was confused -
> > the patch is From: Christophe, but the message talks about Christophe in
> > the third person. Also, it included conversational bits that have no
> > value for the Git history.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> > -------------------->
> > >>From 28e08861b9afab4168b758fb7b95aa7a4da0f668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
> > Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:46:23 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] xen: fix too early kmalloc call
> >
> > Impact: fix bootup crash on xen guests
> >
> > SLAB is not yet up, with earlyprintk it is giving me an Oops in __kmalloc.
> >
> > Replace call to kmalloc() with alloc_bootmem().
> >
> > Reported-by: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/events.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > index ed7527b..3141e14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> > #include <asm/irq.h>
> > @@ -831,8 +832,8 @@ void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
> > int i;
> > size_t size = nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(struct cpu_evtchn_s);
> >
> > - cpu_evtchn_mask_p = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - BUG_ON(cpu_evtchn_mask == NULL);
> > + cpu_evtchn_mask_p = alloc_bootmem(size);
> > + BUG_ON(cpu_evtchn_mask_p == NULL);
>
> Impossible condition :-) alloc_bootmem() crashes before you could catch
> it here.
yeah ... but that's just a current behavior of bootmem. It's always
prudent to check for allocation errors.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists