[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090112151133.GA24852@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:11:33 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14:36AM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi
>
> I discovered a bug in XFS in delayed allocation.
>
> When you take a small partition (52MB in my case) and copy many small
> files on it (source code) that barely fits there, you get -ENOSPC. Then
> sync the partition, some free space pops up, click "retry" in MC an the
> copy continues. They you get again -ENOSPC, you must sync, click "retry"
> and go on. And so on few times until the source code finally fits on the
> XFS partition.
>
> This misbehavior is apparently caused by delayed allocation, delayed
> allocation does not exactly know how much space will be occupied by data,
> so it makes some upper bound guess. Because free space count is only a
> guess, not the actual data being consumed, XFS should not return -ENOSPC
> on behalf of it. When the free space overflows, XFS should sync itself,
> retry allocation and only return -ENOSPC if it fails the second time,
> after the sync.
This looks a lot like: http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=724
It's on my short-term todo list to turn the testcase in that entry
into a proper xfsqa testcase and followup on the investigation by
Dave and Eric.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists