linux-kernel - Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years 2008-2009

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090112161115.GA1474@ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:11:15 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@...il.com>
Cc:	david@...g.hm, Nick Andrew <nick@...k-andrew.net>,
	David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
	Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>,
	Ben Goodger <goodgerster@...il.com>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jeffrey J. Kosowsky" <jeff@...owsky.org>,
	MentalMooMan <slashdot@...eshallam.info>,
	Travis Crump <pretzalz@...hhouse.org>,
	burdell@...ntheinter.net, mills@...l.edu,
	Brian Haberman <brian@...ovationslab.net>,
	Karen O'Donoghue <karen.odonoghue@...y.mil>,
	ntpwg@...ts.ntp.isc.org
Subject: Re: Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years
	2008-2009

On Mon 2009-01-05 11:42:35, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> 2009/1/5  <david@...g.hm>:
> > On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >
> >>> Arguably the kernel's responsibility should be to keep track of the
> >>> most fundamental representation of time possible for a machine (that's
> >>> probably TAI) and it is a userspace responsibility to map from that
> >>> value to other time standards including UTC,
> >>
> >> Yes, this really does seem like the right solution.
> >>
> >>> using control files
> >>> which are updated as leap seconds are declared.
> >>
> >> Lets be clear on what "control files" means.  This does
> >> *NOT* mean some config file shipped by some distro
> >> for some package. That would be a horrid solution.
> >> People don't install updates, patches, etc.  Distros
> >> ship them late, or never, if the distro is old enough.
> >>
> >> A more appropriate solution would be to have
> >> either the kernel or ntpd track the leap seconds
> >> automatically.  First, the ntp protocol already provides
> >> the needed notification of a leap second to anyone
> >> who cares about it (i.e. there is no point in getting a
> >> Linux distro involved in this -- a distribution mechanism
> >> already exists, and works *better* than having a distro
> >> do it).
> >
> > I disagree with this. NTP will only know about leap seconds if it was
> > running and connected to a server that advertised the leap seconds during
> > that month.
> >
> > for example, if you installed a new server today, how would it ever know
> > that there was a leap second a couple of days ago?
> 
> OK, good point.  Unless your distro was less
> than a few days old (unlikely), you are faced with the
> same problem.  Sure, eventually, the distro will publish
> an update (which will add to the existing list of 36 leap
> seconds -- which is needed in any case, since no one
> has a server that's been up since 1958),  but this is
> unlikely to happen during this install window.
> 
> The long term solution would be write an RFC to extend
> NTP to also provide TAI information -- e.g. to add a
> message that indicates the current leap-second offset
> between UTC and TAI.

Offset is not enough; you'd have to provide list of all previous leap
seconds with 'when it happened' timestamps.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/