linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 0/3] Overview, OProfile SPU event profiling support for IBM Cell processor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231776927.6621.112.camel@carll-linux-desktop>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:15:27 -0800
From:	Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	cel <cel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	cbe-oss-dev <cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/3] Overview, OProfile SPU event profiling support for
	IBM Cell processor

On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 10:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0800, Carl Love wrote:
> > I pulled down the git tree, compiled and installed it.  I tested it
> > against the OProfile testsuite, which includes SPU event profiling
> > tests.  Everything passed.  The patch I submitted was against a 2.6.26
> > tree.  You are now on a 2.6.28 tree so perhaps that is why the patch did
> > not apply cleanly.  The patch has been out there for some time.  
> 
> When you submited it on Dec 2, it should have been against whatever was
> the latest upstream at the time, not 2.6.26.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.

Ben, Arnd and Robert:

The patch was against the latest Arnd Cell Kernel tree at the time it
was posted. The OProfile for cell patches have all been submitted,
accepted by Arnd (CELL Kernel maintainer) and pushed up stream by Arnd.
Arnd has waited for the OProfile maintainer to review and approve the
change before Arnd would push it upstream.  

So, at this point, Robert's (OProfile kernel maintainer) and Maynard's
(OProfile user space maintainer) approval for the patches.  

The question now goes to Arnd and Robert, who is going to push the
patches upstream?  Looks like Robert is ready to do it, so Arnd do you
approve the patches?  Would you like to have Robert push the patches
upstream or would you prefer to do it?  I think we need an
answer/agreement on this.  

                 Carl Love

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/