lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:10:01 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@...com>
CC:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reference counting of MMC host driver modules

Enrik Berkhan wrote:
> When removing the mmc_host_driver, everything seems to be fine; the
> MMC/SD block device has been deactivated by mmc_blk_remove(), that in
> turn has stopped the queue via mmc_cleanup_queue(). mmc_cleanup_queue()
> calls blk_cleanup_queue() on the underlying struct request_queue. By
> this, the reference count of the struct request_queues kboj drops to
> zero. The MD driver still has the block device open and, actually,
> things work fine unless the memory of the struct request_queue isn't
> touched, because it is marked dead. Of course, accessing the MD device
> returns EIO, but that's fine.
> 
> When the mmc_host_driver is reloaded, new struct request_queues will be
> allocated and with some probability, the old memory will be re-used for
> them or the old memory locations will be re-used for something else. The
> key point is that the queues still in use by the MD layer will
> effectively no longer be marked dead or completely corrupted.

So in short, the request_queue's reference count goes to zero even
though something still points to it?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ