[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20901120945r2728e6d3oc9237249d748f8dd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:45:02 -0700
From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hskinnemoen@...el.com,
maciej.sosnowski@...el.com, g.liakhovetski@....de,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL, resend] async_tx/dmaengine update for 2.6.29
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> net/core/dev.c | 149 +------
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 5 +-
>> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
>> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +-
>> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 +-
>
> Wouldn't it be better for these changes to go through the net
> tree?
>
It was awkward to separate the reformatting of the core api from its
users. In this exceptional case these changes were limited to areas
inside #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE/CONFIG_NET_DMA.
In general, Maciej and I send purely incremental patches through the
net tree [1].
Regards,
Dan
[1]: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=649274d993212e7c23c0cb734572c2311c200872
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists