linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <496B899E.7060605@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:19:10 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	sfrench@...ba.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Some people took me at my word and so we have the 2.6.30 code starting to
> trickle in already.



When CIFS is built-in (=y) and staging/rt28[67]0 =y, there are multiple
definitions of:

build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1d8ad0): multiple definition of `MD5Init'
build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1dbb30): multiple definition of `MD5Update'
build-r8250.out:(.text+0x1db9b0): multiple definition of `MD5Final'

all of which need to have more unique identifiers for their global
symbols (e.g., rt28_md5_init, cifs_md5_init, foo, blah, bar).


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/