[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496B9562.8040601@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:09:22 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: include apicnum.h in acpidef.h
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Impact: clean up
>
> it seems Ingo revert it wrongly.
> put it back again
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/apicdef.h
> @@ -132,12 +132,7 @@
> #define APIC_BASE_MSR 0x800
> #define X2APIC_ENABLE (1UL << 10)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> -# define MAX_IO_APICS 64
> -#else
> -# define MAX_IO_APICS 128
> -# define MAX_LOCAL_APIC 32768
> -#endif
> +#include <asm/apicnum.h>
>
> /*
> * All x86-64 systems are xAPIC compatible.
Hi Yinghai,
Actually, Ingo got it right. I had introduced the apicnum.h file to
get around header entanglements. But as Ingo pointed out, I did the
include file chain wrong, so removing the apicnum.h file seemed to be
the correct thing to do. (I just haven't figured out yet how to remove
a file via email patch. I was just going to clean it up next time I
pushed changes to Ingo.)
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists