[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901121459310.28952@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:00:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RESEND] tracing: Add a new workqueue tracer
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > WARNING: usage of NR_CPUS is often wrong - consider using cpu_possible(),
> > num_possible_cpus(), for_each_possible_cpu(), etc
> > #953: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c:153:
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> >
> > We should probably change them to for_each_possible_cpu, or online cpu.
> >
> > -- Steve
>
>
> I found it very convenient because I didn't have to allocate
> my cpu list array dynamically with it :-)
>
> I'm preparing a v2...
>
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists