linux-kernel - Re: - lis3lv02d-separate-the-core-from-hp-acpi-api.patch removed from -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090112203044.GE2299@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:30:44 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: - lis3lv02d-separate-the-core-from-hp-acpi-api.patch removed
	from -mm tree

On Mon 2009-01-12 11:58:09, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch titled
>      LIS3LV02D: separate the core from HP ACPI API
> has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
>      lis3lv02d-separate-the-core-from-hp-acpi-api.patch
> 
> This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
> 
> The current -mm tree may be found at
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

Thanks!

BTW... "-" for both "patch is junk" and "patch is now mainline" is quite
confusing. Could we get you to use "-" for "patch was dropped because
it is junk" and "*" (or something) for "patch is now mainline"?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/