linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] Make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:11:03 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tim Abbott <tabbott@....EDU>, andi@...stfloor.org,
	jbarnold@....EDU, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vda.linux@...glemail.com, andersk@....EDU, wdaher@....EDU,
	knikanth@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Make section names compatible with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections

> So we `make it possible to build the kernel > with "gcc
> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections"'.  So what?  Where is the value in
> that?

The original reason was that it allows the linker to drop unused
functions automatically. That is a good thing by itself -- e.g.
if it was universal we could avoid a lot of #ifdefs.  And it
also turned out that standard kernel builds get smaller by it iirc.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/