[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496AD1C6.9080906@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:14:46 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: matthltc@...ibm.com
CC: Matt Cross <matt.cross@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28? (Was: Re: ebtables
match inverted in 2.6.28?)
Matthew Helsley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:00 -0500, Matt Cross wrote:
>> I think the work to move ebtables to use xtables broke ebtables.
>> Specifically, in commit 8cc784eec6676b58e7f60419c88179aaa97bf71c the
>> return value of the match functions was inverted so that they return 1
>> (true) on matches instead of EBT_MATCH (0), and vice versa (look in
>> ebt_ip.c). The logic in ebtables.c (ebt_do_table() and
>> EBT_MATCH_ITERATE()) expect match functions to return 0 for matches.
>>
>> The patch at the end of this message fixes the problem, but seems a
>> little hacky to me. Who's the right person to address this?
Jan, could you have a look at this please?
>> --- linux-2.6.28.orig/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-24
>> 18:26:37.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6.28/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c 2008-12-31
>> 16:17:44.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
>> {
>> par->match = m->u.match;
>> par->matchinfo = m->data;
>> - return m->u.match->match(skb, par);
>> + return !m->u.match->match(skb, par);
>> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists