[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901122353.59887.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:53:59 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, oliver@...kum.org, gregkh@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, pavel@...e.cz,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] USB wakeup problem on Toshiba Portege R500
On Monday 12 January 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > My proposal:
> > >
> > > Devices and events that are clearly associated with system
> > > wakeup should be enabled by default. For example: Power
> > > button and laptop lid.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > All other devices capable of waking up the system should be
> > > disabled by default. This presumably includes every PCI
> > > device. If users want keyboard or mouse events to cause
> > > a system resume then they will have to configure their
> > > desktop management program to enable it.
> >
> > I generally agree, with one exception. There are network adapters which
> > can be enabled to wake up by the BIOS and their drivers set them up for WoL
> > currently on this basis. These should remain enabled IMO.
>
> How do we know which adapters these are? IMO the PCI core should
> disable wakeup by default for all devices when they are detected.
This is what we do.
> Is it sufficient to have the adapter drivers enable wakeup during
> their probe routines?
Yes, it is.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists