[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090112083734.GB8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:34 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at
.kernel_thread'
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> [2009-01-12 09:07:19]:
> On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
> >
> > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
> > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported
> > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157
> > >
> > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen
> > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is
> > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel.
>
> Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from
> 2.6.28 . Please confirm.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
sorry, I meant it was introduced in 2.6.28-git4 and is still reproducible
with 2.6.29-rc1.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists