[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090113050831.GF12392@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:38:31 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Maneesh Soni <maneesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/6] kprobes: Per-probe disabling support
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:55:27PM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, kprobes can disable all probes at once, but can't disable it
> individually (not unregister, just disable an kprobe, because unregistering
> needs to wait for scheduler synchronization).
> These patches introduce APIs for on-the-fly per-probe disabling and
> re-enabling by dis-arming/re-arming its breakpoint instruction.
>
> These patches can be applied on the latest -mm tree including my previous
> bugfix patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/5/472).
>
> You can download a test of this feature from here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3082&action=view
>
> Thank you,
>
> Documentation/kprobes.txt | 38 +++++-
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 51 +++++++-
> kernel/kprobes.c | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
...for the patchset.
Thanks for the work Masami. We'll need to allow this set to cook in
-mm/next for a few weeks before it goes upstream.
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists