[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496C6FBA.2090709@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:40:58 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
Hello, Jens.
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> I think the right thing to do is setting REQ_QUIET on the trial
>> barrier request.
>
> It would surely work, but XFS doesn't really have a way to do that. Then
> we would have to add a bio quiet flag and inherit that.
>
> I kind of liked the old behaviour. What about something like the below?
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index a824e49..eddba4a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1448,6 +1448,11 @@ static inline void __generic_make_request(struct bio *bio)
> err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto end_io;
> }
> + if (bio_barrier(bio) && bio_has_data(bio) &&
> + (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto end_io;
> + }
>
> ret = q->make_request_fn(q, bio);
> } while (ret);
I have no objection against it. I kind of like having single test
point but it's a corner case anyway so no biggie.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists