linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET linux-2.6-x86:tip] x86: make percpu offsets zero-based on SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <496C717F.70204@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:48:31 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mingo@...e.hu, travis@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, steiner@....com, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET linux-2.6-x86:tip] x86: make percpu offsets zero-based
 on SMP

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Each step was tested with gcc-4.1.3, 4.2.3 and 4.3.1 on x86_64, 4.3.1
> on i386 for both SMP and UP configurations.  The final state is
> currently being tested using 4.2.3 on both x86_64 and 32.

Aieee.. two sentences mixed up in my head.  Correction:

Each step was tested with gcc-4.3.1 for both x86_64 and 32.  The final
step for x86_64 has been tested with gcc-4.1.3, 4.2.3 and 4.3.1.
Currently, I'm burn-testing both x86_64 and 32 using gcc-4.2.3 with
all patches applied.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/