linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231852628.6954.4.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:17:08 -0600
From:	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ecryptfs-devel@...ts.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question

cc'ing ecryptfs-devel.  mhalcrow has moved on to the dark side^W^W^W
another company.

Shaggy

On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:20 +0900, hooanon05@...oo.co.jp wrote:
> Here are several fixes for linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs.
> 
> - The ecryptfs inode holds a reference to the lower inode, but doesn't
>   increment the reference counter. When a user sets inotify to the
>   ecryptfs inode, it may live without the corresponding dentry. In this
>   case the referecen to the lower inode may be broken.
>   This patch maintains the reference of the lower inode.
> 
> - follow the VFS unlink sequence in ecryptfs_unlink() which is
>   inrementing and decrementing the inode->i_count and the reference
>   counter for the dentry.
> 
> - maintain the link count and ctime in ecryptfs_rmdir() because a user
>   may issue fstat(2) later.
> 
> - remove the unnecessary d_drop()s in ecryptfs_link().
> 
> And I have experienced a strange behaviour. When ecryptfs gets -ENOSPC
> from the lower fs, it converts and returns EINVAL to the userspace. Is
> this an intended behaviour?
> 
> 
> J. R. Okajima
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> ===================================================================
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c	19 Dec 2008 03:05:27 -0000	1.1
> +++ linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c	19 Dec 2008 19:52:26 -0000	1.2
> @@ -430,9 +430,6 @@ out_lock:
>  	unlock_dir(lower_dir_dentry);
>  	dput(lower_new_dentry);
>  	dput(lower_old_dentry);
> -	d_drop(lower_old_dentry);
> -	d_drop(new_dentry);
> -	d_drop(old_dentry);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> 
> @@ -444,7 +441,10 @@ static int ecryptfs_unlink(struct inode 
>  	struct dentry *lower_dir_dentry;
> 
>  	lower_dir_dentry = lock_parent(lower_dentry);
> +	dget(lower_dentry);
> +	atomic_inc_return(&lower_dentry->d_inode->i_count);
>  	rc = vfs_unlink(lower_dir_inode, lower_dentry);
> +	dput(lower_dentry);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Error in vfs_unlink; rc = [%d]\n", rc);
>  		goto out_unlock;
> @@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_unlink(struct inode 
>  	dentry->d_inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
>  	d_drop(dentry);
>  out_unlock:
> +	iput(lower_dentry->d_inode);
>  	unlock_dir(lower_dir_dentry);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> @@ -538,8 +539,12 @@ static int ecryptfs_rmdir(struct inode *
>  	fsstack_copy_attr_times(dir, lower_dir_dentry->d_inode);
>  	dir->i_nlink = lower_dir_dentry->d_inode->i_nlink;
>  	unlock_dir(lower_dir_dentry);
> -	if (!rc)
> +	if (!rc) {
> +		struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> +		inode->i_nlink = ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(inode)->i_nlink;
> +		inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
>  		d_drop(dentry);
> +	}
>  	dput(dentry);
>  	return rc;
>  }
> Index: linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
> ===================================================================
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
> --- linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/super.c	19 Dec 2008 04:37:43 -0000	1.1
> +++ linux-2.6.27/fs/ecryptfs/super.c	19 Dec 2008 19:52:26 -0000	1.2
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_destroy_inode(struc
>  		}
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> +	iput(inode_info->wii_inode);
>  	ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(&inode_info->crypt_stat);
>  	kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info);
>  }
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ static void ecryptfs_destroy_inode(struc
>   */
>  void ecryptfs_init_inode(struct inode *inode, struct inode *lower_inode)
>  {
> +	atomic_inc_return(&lower_inode->i_count);
>  	ecryptfs_set_inode_lower(inode, lower_inode);
>  	inode->i_ino = lower_inode->i_ino;
>  	inode->i_version++;
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/