[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090113144505.GA4488@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:45:05 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - include linux/types.h instead of
asm/types.h
* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> [Ingo Molnar - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 01:59:28PM +0100]
> |
> | * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> |
> | > [Cyrill Gorcunov - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:09:05PM +0300]
> | > | Impact: cleanup
> | > |
> | > | 'make headers_check' warns that linux/types.h is
> | > | preferred over asm/types.h. So be it.
> | > |
> | > | Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> | > | CC: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> | > | CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> | > | CC: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> | > | ---
> | > |
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 2 ++
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/kvm.h | 2 +-
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 2 +-
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/mtrr.h | 1 +
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace-abi.h | 2 +-
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext.h | 2 +-
> | > | arch/x86/include/asm/swab.h | 2 +-
> | > | 7 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> | > |
> | > ...
> | >
> | > well... on the other hand I'm not sure if it's really
> | > a good idea to include linux/types.h where we need only
> | > __u[8,16] and so on definitions.
> |
> | Well, linux/types.h is supposed to be a 'lightweight', 'core data types
> | only' kind of header file, so including it is not wrong per se.
> |
> | Sam, is there some other preferred way perhaps to resolve these?
> |
> | Ingo
> |
>
> Until such a file not passed to some *.S. For example for e820.h we have
> it included to arch/x86/boot/header.S but fortunately we're bound by
> __ASSEMBLY__. So there linux/types.h shouldn't hurt. Will check others
> and report then.
Any reason to not protect types.h with #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ ?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists