linux-kernel - Re: ext2 + -osync: not as easy as it seems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:46:40 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: ext2 + -osync: not as easy as it seems

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:30:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
>   But it's not the whole story. Strictly speaking we should also call
> blkdev_issue_flush() whenever we write things because of O_SYNC or
> O_DIRSYNC flags. My patch does also that (it's based on the previous ext2
> patch I've sent a while before).

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/