[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496CE3A2.4060605@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:55:30 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - fix export private data to userspace
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | >
> | >> 4) setup.h - COMMAND_LINE_SIZE saved for userspace, bootloaders
> | >> could use it.
> | >
> | > Doesn't this need to be (at least) _COMMAND_LINE_SIZE to avoid
> | > polluting the namespace, not sure it can be changed though as the
> | > horse is already out of the barn.
> |
> | No, this is not one of those cases, but it's worth explaining why.
> |
> | You can introduce symbols into the general namespace if *and only if*
> | they are in a header file that is invoked directly by the user. In
> | other words, such a header file is unusable by libc, but setup.h doesn't
> | contain anything needed by libc in the first place.
> |
> | -hpa
> |
>
> So we could just fence it by __KERNEL__?
>
We might, as userspace shouldn't need COMMAND_LINE_SIZE anyway (see
other post), but I'm rather confused as how you got that from what I
wrote above.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists