[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090113190142.GA2508@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:01:42 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v9][RFC] mutex: implement adaptive spinning
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > below is the v8 -> v10 delta patch - for all who'd like to review the
> > changes.
>
> Hmm. This does seem to indicate that v10 lost many of the preempt
> changes. Probably because Peter went back to v7 to create it.
>
> I also wonder about the timing numbers - the numbers were probably done
> with some random version and then not re-done, so the commit message is
> not necessarily "sane" in that respect - the timings quoted don't
> necessarily match the code committed.
yeah - i didnt take care with v10's commit log because it will be redone
with a structural splitup anyway, instead of the current time based
history.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists