[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090113233654.GB31490@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:36:54 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 06:26:05PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:54:08 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov said:
>
> > Who should adjust the scores for newly created processes? Who should
> > check that processes in the first group have negative oom ajustment and
> > in the second group a positive value? Who determines when its time to
> > ajust the scores?
>
> Are you saying that you, as the box's administrator, don't know the answers
> to those questions?
>
> Or are you asking what the actual method of implementation is - which process
> is supposed to write to (possibly some other process) oom_adjust, and when?
Unfortunately I do not know the answers. Since all parameters are highly
dynamic and can not be always automatically tuned. And we do not have a
daemon to watch created processes. And in the general case we can not
change the application.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists