[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f0901131613l65bff51fo22e86a01ba2c0720@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:13:54 +1300
From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Roland McGrath" <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
drepper@...hat.com, vegard.nossum@...il.com,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sys_waitid: return -EFAULT for NULL
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Well yes. waitid() has been in there since 2.6.9. I assume that it
>> has had this wait4-emulation mode for that amount of time as well?
>
> Correct.
>
>> Well, we might get away with it. But formally speaking, we should live
>> with our Linux-specific screwup.
>
> I agree with both of you and I don't care which we do.
I don't feel strongly about this, but lean towards the idea that we
should fix things, as per Roland's patch, and I suspect we can get
away with it, for the reasons I mentioned already.
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists