lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020901132319g50dc9e50o283b0d263f287eea@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:19:01 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Manfred Spraul" <manfred@...orfullife.com>, krh@...hat.com,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, dcm@....org, Nadia.Derbey@...l.net,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/idr.c: Zero memory properly in idr_remove_all

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> If the idr code passes uninitialized objects to kmem_cache_free(), then
>> the next kmem_cache_alloc will return a bad object.
>>
>
> None of this got us much closer to fixing the bug ;)
>
> What do we think of just removing the constructor and using
> kmem_cache_zalloc()?

Why do I get the feeling that we have merged a similar patch before?

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>

>
> --- a/lib/idr.c~a
> +++ a/lib/idr.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int idr_pre_get(struct idr *idp, gfp_t g
>  {
>        while (idp->id_free_cnt < IDR_FREE_MAX) {
>                struct idr_layer *new;
> -               new = kmem_cache_alloc(idr_layer_cache, gfp_mask);
> +               new = kmem_cache_zalloc(idr_layer_cache, gfp_mask);
>                if (new == NULL)
>                        return (0);
>                move_to_free_list(idp, new);
> @@ -623,16 +623,10 @@ void *idr_replace(struct idr *idp, void
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(idr_replace);
>
> -static void idr_cache_ctor(void *idr_layer)
> -{
> -       memset(idr_layer, 0, sizeof(struct idr_layer));
> -}
> -
>  void __init idr_init_cache(void)
>  {
>        idr_layer_cache = kmem_cache_create("idr_layer_cache",
> -                               sizeof(struct idr_layer), 0, SLAB_PANIC,
> -                               idr_cache_ctor);
> +                               sizeof(struct idr_layer), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
>  }
>
>  /**
> _
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ