[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496DA0FF.2060206@knaff.lu>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:23:27 +0100
From: Alain Knaff <alain@...ff.lu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: The policy on initramfs decompression failure
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Alain Knaff <alain@...ff.lu> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> And your argument makes little sense: if there is something wrong then one
>>> looks at the logs _anyway_.
>> Unfortunately, not everybody has the knowledge or equipment ready to set
>> up a serial console... [...]
>
> By your argument the ton of warnings we emit in various situations are
> wrong too and all should be panic()s.
That is not my argument. I never said something like that.
I don't know, but I have to wonder about the strength of _your_ position if
the only way to defend it is to put words into other people's mouth.
> That argument is bogus.
Indeed that argument is bogus. However, I'm not sure where it is coming from...
> Not looking at the logs makes boot problem analysis harder of course. Nor
> is your argument actually true: you can use printk_delay or any other
> method.
This is interesting information. Where can I find documentation about this?
Neither google, nor a find-grep in the kernel sources turned up anything
useful...
> Or you can use the VGA console and use shift-pageup ...
No you can't. Try it. Or is this only a kvm artifact?
>
> Ingo
Alain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists