linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix return value of mem_cgroup_hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:45:46 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix return value of mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write()

Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> [2009-01-14 16:10:52]:
> 
>> When there are sub-dirs, writing to memory.use_hierarchy returns -EBUSY,
>> this doesn't seem to fit the meaning of EBUSY, and is inconsistent with
>> memory.swappiness, which returns -EINVAL in this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> The patch does much more than the changelog says. The reason for EBUSY
> is that the group is in use due to children or existing references and
> tasks. I think EBUSY is the correct error code to return.
> 

Sounds reasonable for me. Thanks.

Regards
Li Zefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/