[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901140857.n0E8vwbg098948@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:57:58 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: jmorris@...ei.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO #14 (mmotm 2008-12-30-16-05) 02/10] Singly linked list implementation.
James Morris wrote:
> > By ommiting pointer to previous element, the reader becomes read lock free,
> > which is good thing for implementing "write once read many" list.
>
> This has a technical ack from Paul, but what about Linus' long-standing
> objection to singly-linked lists in the kernel? I'm sure this has been
> discussed re. your patches, but I can't find a reference.
>
OK, for reviewers' ease, I purged list1 for now.
Next posting (#15) will use standard doubly linked list with rw_semaphore.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists