linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] async: Add some documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090114112450.1a1af271@gondolin>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:24:50 +0100
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] async: Add some documentation.

On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:49:52 +1100,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Add some kerneldoc to the async interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
> > +/**
> > + * async_schedule_special - schedule a function for asynchronous execution with a special running queue
> > + * @ptr: function to execute asynchronously
> > + * @data: data pointer to pass to the function
> > + * @running: list head to add to while running
> > + *
> > + * Returns an async_cookie_t that may be used for checkpointing later.
> > + * @running may be used in the async_synchronize_*_special() functions
> > + * to wait on a special running queue rather than on the global running
> > + * queue.
> > + * Note: This function may be called from atomic or non-atomic contexts.
> > + */
> >  async_cookie_t async_schedule_special(async_func_ptr *ptr, void *data, struct list_head *running)
> 
> Rather than polishing a turd, can we rename this "special" stuff to
> something more descriptive? I'm not the only person to complain
> about this. How about async_schedule_list()?
> 
> After all, async_schedule_list() describes *exactly* how it is
> different to async_schedule(), while the "_special" keywords really
> suck when you consider code is supposed to be self documenting....

async_schedule_list() sounds better, agreed, but I'd prefer to change
that in a seperate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/