[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901141157.32720.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:57:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] PCI PCIe portdrv: Fix allocation of interrupts
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
[...]
> > I'm sorry but I don't understand what the problem is.
> > Do you mean pci_disable_msix() doesn't work on some platforms?
>
> No, I don't. It was just confusion on my side, sorry.
>
> Please have a look at the new version of the patch I sent yesterday
> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=123185510828181&w=4).
BTW, in your patch the first dummy pci_enable_msix() allocates just one
vector, which means that the contents of both
msix_entries[idx_hppme].entry and msix_entries[idx_aer].entry will be the same,
if my reading of the spec (PCI 3.0 in this case) is correct.
However, if the second pci_enable_msix() allocates two vectors, the contents of the
message number fields in the PCIE_CAPABILITIES_REG and PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS
registers may change as a result.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists