linux-kernel - Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090114003546.GA1705@ioremap.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:35:46 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
Cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 07:24:35PM -0500, Bill Davidsen (davidsen@....com) wrote:
> >So effectively oom_adj only works as enable/disable switch, and since no
> >one knows how to tune it, it is better to do not touch at all. And get
> >ssh killed. I believe if it is ever used then only to disable oom at
> >all, which is wrong, since task still may be killed but after some
> >others. My patch adds a simple priority for that based on the name of
> >the process, which are known to the administrators who maintain given
> >system.
> >  
> If nothing else, this would seem to reduce the number of processes for 
> which the OOM coefficient of evil must be calculated.

Yes, it allows this.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/