[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114111755.GN2913@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:17:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make 32bit MAX_HARDIRQSS_PER_CPU to be NR_VECTORS
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Impact: clean up to be same as 64bit
>
> 32bit is use per-cpu vector too, so don't use default NR_IRQS
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ typedef struct {
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
>
> +/* We can have at most NR_VECTORS irqs routed to a cpu at a time */
> +#define MAX_HARDIRQS_PER_CPU NR_VECTORS
> +
> #define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT
> #define __IRQ_STAT(cpu, member) (per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).member)
applied to tip/x86/cleanups. Btw., isnt the irq_vectors.h bit (mentioned
in the diffstat) missing?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists