linux-kernel - [PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231945697.3970.1.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:38:17 +0530
From:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be
	static

Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 1b6c05b..d3f1ef4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
  * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
  * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
  */
-void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
+static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
-- 
1.6.0.6



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/