[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114155859.GO25103@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:58:59 -0500
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:09:59AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:35:33 -0500,
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
> >
> > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> >
> > Dynamically allocate mod->ref instead of fixing it in the struct module.
> > Reduces on disk space wasted in the module .ko, and kills a loop
> > initializing the local_t it contains since we can just kzalloc it.
> >
> > This matters when we're talking about large NR_CPUS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > The patch removing cacheline_aligned from struct module_ref should be
> > applied as well to cut down on the amount of memory we allocate. This
> > patch makes a nice stopgap until we have per_cpu module references.
> >
> > cheers, Kyle
>
> Similar patches (including mine) have been already posted, but no
> proceed until now...
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/11/315
Ah, sigh.
It would be nice to get this sorted out, since we're serious wasting
disk space for no good reason...
Although as Richard points out, dropping the cacheline_aligned might
drop networking performance (which, sigh, is also stupid) but allocating
128b * NR_CPUS is just a ridiculous amount of memory to waste for a
reference count...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists