lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231898541.5937.143.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:02:21 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: x86/mce merge, integration hickup + crash, design thoughts

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 01:45 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >>>> A far more useful design for handling MCE events would be to feed 
> >>>> them into printk logging.
> >>> If there's ASCII logging it should be separate from normal printk.
> >>
> >> Well, why? 
> >
> > Mostly because the problem is not a kernel issue. Especially large 
> > systems with a lot of memory can generate a lot of corrected events (one 
> > bit flips in DIMMs are not that uncommon) and it's not good to mix that 
> > all up into other kernel messages. It also makes it more clear that it's 
> > not a kernel problem, but a hardware problem. I've got feedback over the 
> > years that confirm this sight.
> 
> Is your argument that syslog is not suitable for the logging of hw events?
> 
> If that is your argument then the answer is to extend syslog with those 
> aspects, instead of widening the quirky /dev based mce ABIs to achieve 
> something similar.

In current /dev based mce ABI implementation, syslog is used for logging
hw events, not though printk, but through /dev/mcelog and /sbin/mcelog.

For uncorrected MCE, they should be logged via printk. But for corrected
MCE, there could be thousands/millions ones (imagining you have a DIMM
with one data pin corrupted). I don't think it's a good idea to blend
these hardware events with other kernel software events in printk.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ