[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496E297B.6010100@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:05:47 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
ying.huang@...el.com, Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...il.com>,
priyankag@...gle.com
Subject: Re: x86/mce merge, integration hickup + crash, design thoughts
>
> From my point of view: a single, consistent, easy logging interface
> for the kernel to send *structured data* about hardware/system events
> and errors up to userspace.
Which kinds of events were you thinking of?
So far we managed by cramming some other CPU events like thermal
trip into "pseudo banks" in struct mce. Admittedly it's not the
most pretty solution in the world, but it worked.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists