[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090114105300.66bd014d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:53:00 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:33:19 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Please pull the adaptive-mutexes-for-linus git tree
<fear>
- It seems a major shortcoming that the feature is disabled if
CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y. It means that lots of people won't test it.
- When people hit performance/latency oddities, it would be nice if
they had a /proc knob with which they could disable this feature at
runtime.
This would also be useful for comparative performance testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists