lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114021801.GA14759@bulgaria.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:18:01 -0800
From:	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, arve@...gle.com
Cc:	San Mehat <san@...roid.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Robert Love <rlove@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lowmemory android driver not needed?


Looping in Arve who wrote the low memory killer and can explain things
in more detail.

Brian

[Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>]
> Hi San,
> 
> Alan Cox pointed me at the /proc/<pid>/oom_adj file that controls the
> oom-killer score for any process as being more than sufficent to control
> the oom killer.
> 
> This makes me wonder why you wrote the android lowmemlorykiller driver?
> 
> What is that driver for that is not already present in the existing
> oom_* values for every process?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ