[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090113184239.e6b6e68e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: reif@...thlink.net, sparclinux-owner@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:39 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Robert Reif <reif@...thlink.net>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:04 -0500
>
> > Todays git produces this compile error on sparc32:
> >
> > kernel/up.c:10: error: redefinition of ___smp_call_function_single___
> > /usr/src/sparc32/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:78: error: previous definition of ___smp_call_function_single___ was here
>
> Andrew, are you sure that Makefile condition for compiling
> up.o is correct?
you give me grounds for now being ;)
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
> obj-y += smp.o
> else
> obj-y += up.o
> endif
>
> If an arch doesn't use generic SMP helpers, there is no way
> we should compile up.c into the tree when SMP.
>
How's about this?
--- a/kernel/Makefile~a
+++ a/kernel/Makefile
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
obj-y += smp.o
else
-obj-y += up.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += up.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists