[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901141751200.24309@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:53:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...e.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Olaf Dabrunz <od@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: PCI, ACPI, IRQ, IOAPIC: reroute PCI interrupt to legacy boot
interrupt equivalent
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com> writes:
>
> Which leads me to conclude.
> - IRQ handling in the RT kernel is hopelessly broken.
> - IRQ threads are a bad idea.
I would rephrase that to
-- boot interrupts are hopelessly broken
>
> Because it is all leading to stupid patches and stupid development.
Hmm, WTF should we have maskable interrupts for anyway? Sounds like broken
hardware design to me.
>
> None of this works reliably on level triggered ioapic irqs.
>
I guess this means that ioapic's are not for RTOS of any kind.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists