[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090115085728.GA28607@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:57:28 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: simplify HIGHMEM-related Kconfig entries
* Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> 14.01.09 20:39 >>>
> >Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Additionally remove the dependency of X86_PAE on !HIGHMEM4G - at least
> >> I can't understand why that dependency existed.
> >
> >At least originally, the meaning of the x86 highmem entries were:
> >
> > No highmem - No highmem, no PAE
> > HIGHMEM4G - Highmem, no PAE
> > HIGHMEM64G - Highmem, PAE
> >
> >So X86_PAE and HIGHMEM4G is a bit of a contradiction. I haven't looked
> >at the logic in detail, or remember offhand if there have been any
> >weakening of the definitions above; e.g. someone could have implemented
> >a way to do PAE without highmem, to get access to the NX bits.
>
> Exactly - .23 made PAE an independently selectable option (in
> particular, the no-highmem+PAE combination is now valid), but I can't
> see why it added the !HIGHMEM4G dependency.
There's no deep reason, it just has never really been tested that way. I
think we should try it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists