[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496F4B63.6070609@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:42:43 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
chinang.ma@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sharad.c.tripathi@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
andi.kleen@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
harita.chilukuri@...el.com, douglas.w.styner@...el.com,
peter.xihong.wang@...el.com, hubert.nueckel@...el.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, srostedt@...hat.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:46:09AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> It would also be nice if someone could do the performance analysis on
>> the SLUB bug. I ran sysbench in oltp mode here and the results look
>> like this:
>>
>> [ number of transactions per second from 10 runs. ]
>>
>> min max avg sd
>> 2.6.29-rc1-slab 833.77 852.32 845.10 4.72
>> 2.6.29-rc1-slub 823.61 851.94 836.74 8.57
>>
>> And no, the numbers are not flipped, SLUB beats SLAB here. :(
>
> Um. More transactions per second is good. Your numbers show SLAB
> beating SLUB (even on your dual-CPU system). And SLAB shows a lower
> standard deviation, which is also good.
*blush*
Will do oprofile tomorrow. Thanks Matthew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists