[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090115160517.GA12768@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:05:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc] regulator: add get_status()
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:35:29AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > Please send a separate patch for the kerneldoc as I've already applied.
> So that will be the first member of "struct regulator_ops" to
> grow kerneldoc ... out of a total of fifteen (now) members.
> Hmm...
> Maybe I'm not understanding what's meant by "kerneldoc adding".
> Perhaps it's nothing more than a sentence resembling "returns
> REGULATOR_STATUS_* code or negative errno", and not real
> kerneldoc?
No, real kerneldoc - this was added recently, check current mainline
(eg, commit c8e7e4640facbe99d10a6e262523b25be129b9b9). I'm not saying
it's great but it's there.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists