linux-kernel - Re: scripts/checkpatch.pl: WARNING: patch prefix 'arch' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090115185009.GE6896@shadowen.org>
Date:	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:50:09 +0000
From:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
Cc:	davej@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scripts/checkpatch.pl: WARNING: patch prefix 'arch' exists,
	appears to be a -p0 patch

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:33:40PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Andy,
> 
> How to get rid of this warning:
> 
>  #./scripts/checkpatch.pl --file arch/x86/kernel/module_32.c
> WARNING: patch prefix 'arch' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 152 lines checked
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/module_32.c has style problems, please review.  If any
> of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

That looks wrong to me.  Will have a look at it.

Ahh yes, thats just wrong.  Should be fixed in the tip of my tree, and
will be in the next block of updates.  You can check against the version
at:

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/