[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090115114846.388781a7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:48:46 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/4] memcg: don't call res_counter_uncharge when
obsolete
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:25:39 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> [2009-01-14 17:51:21]:
>
> > This is a new one. Please review.
> >
> > ===
> > From: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> >
> > mem_cgroup_get ensures that the memcg that has been got can be accessed
> > even after the directory has been removed, but it doesn't ensure that parents
> > of it can be accessed: parents might have been freed already by rmdir.
> >
> > This causes a bug in case of use_hierarchy==1, because res_counter_uncharge
> > climb up the tree.
> >
> > Check if the memcg is obsolete, and don't call res_counter_uncharge when obsole.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
>
> I liked the earlier, EBUSY approach that ensured that parents could
> not go away if children exist. IMHO, the code has gotten too complex
> and has too many corner cases. Time to revisit it.
>
It's on my plan.
I'll fix this by CSS-ID patch.
When I recored memcg's CSS-ID to swap_cgroup (not pointer to memcg),
we never need memcg's refcnt.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists