[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496F988D.2010601@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:11:57 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Adam Osuchowski <adwol@...k.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Is 386 processor still supported?
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> You can actually escape the FPU emulator if you have a proper computer
> (an i386/80287 combo, anyone? ;) -- we've got it right actually :) ), but
> the rest and overall I agree with you. And I think i386-class cores can
> be still seen in some embedded applications, so there may be non-epsilon
> interest yet.
>
I did run Linux way back when on a 16 MHz 80386/80387 combo. All the
memory was on the ISA bus, too. It ran at a whopping 0.57 BogoMIPS, and
we still used it as a server.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists